Whakatāne residents are up in arms over plans to clear trees for a solar farm, sparking a heated debate. The Whakatāne District Council has shown support for the distressed residents of a country lane, who are concerned about Genesis Energy's proposal to remove their trees. However, Genesis Energy argues that the removal is essential to make way for 33kV power lines, connecting their solar farm to the national grid in Edgecumbe.
Peter Askey, a resident of Putiki Rd, has been vocal in his opposition. He highlights the irony of the situation, given Genesis Energy's commitment to sustainability and traditional Māori design, which often features trees as a central element. Askey emphasizes that the western side of the road, where the houses and residents live, is the ideal location for the power lines, yet Genesis Energy seems to favor the eastern side, which is less populated.
Among the trees at risk is a 75-year-old phoenix palm, a cherished native tree planted by Askey's father-in-law, Laurie McLaren, after his return from World War II. The Askeys have also contributed to the local ecosystem by planting a variety of native trees, including kahikatea, totara, and rimu, as well as a 60-year-old oak tree with a treehouse, all of which are now at risk.
Despite the residents' efforts to engage with Genesis Energy, exploring alternatives like a shorter route across farmland and undergrounding the lines, the energy company has stood firm on its preferred route along the 1.7km stretch of road. This has left the residents feeling frustrated and concerned about the potential loss of their beloved trees.
The Whakatāne District Council, while sympathetic to the residents' plight, has limited influence over electricity infrastructure on roading corridors. They have proposed a statement of support, acknowledging Genesis Energy's right of access but encouraging the utility operator to consider alternative routes that minimize disruption to existing residents. The council's statement also highlights the importance of respecting the local environment and the cultural significance of trees in Māori traditions.
Genesis Energy, however, maintains that the western side of Putiki Rd is the only viable option, citing technical, environmental, and planning constraints. They assure the community that they are committed to working with landowners to minimize disruption and have already invested significant time and resources in exploring alternative routes. Despite the residents' offer of an easement on their land, Genesis Energy believes that crossing Putiki Rd multiple times would introduce additional design, risk, and installation challenges.
The controversy surrounding this issue has sparked a heated debate, with residents, the council, and Genesis Energy all expressing their concerns. The question remains: can a compromise be found that respects the environment, the residents' quality of life, and Genesis Energy's energy goals?
